We used to fear plagiarism. Now we fear irrelevance.
In the age of AI, anyone can sound like an expert. Just paste a prompt, tweak the tone, and voilĆ āinstant authority. But beneath the polished outputs and viral explainers lies a quiet crisis: weāre confusing fluency with understanding, and performance with depth.
Welcome to the rise of the Prompt Professorāa new archetype born from the same system you critiqued in Copy/Paste University in the Prompt Era. These are creators, consultants, and even educators whoāve mastered the art of prompting but skipped the part where learning happens.
š§ The Prompt Professor Playbook
- Quote a philosopher youāve never read
- Summarize a framework you donāt fully grasp
- Generate a case study with zero field experience
- Use AI to write a āthought pieceā in 30 seconds
- Add emojis, urgency, and a call to action
Itās not just performativeāitās profitable. Prompt Professors dominate LinkedIn, TikTok, and even classrooms. They sound brilliant. They trend. But ask them to explain their own content without AI, and the illusion cracks.
š The Cost of Instant Expertise
This isnāt just about ego. Itās about erosion.
- Students submit AI-written essays without understanding the topic
- Creators build brands on AI-generated insights they canāt defend
- Policymakers quote AI summaries without vetting the sources
- Micro-entrepreneurs copy AI business plans that donāt fit their context
Weāre not just outsourcing laborāweāre outsourcing thought. And in doing so, we risk building a society of performers without practice, leaders without learning, and experts without experience.
š Highlight from Copy/Paste University
In your original piece, you warned:
āAI has mastered the copy/paste gameābut human creativity, context, and ethical rigor remain irreplaceable.ā
This new wave of Prompt Professors proves that point. Theyāve mastered the game, but not the substance. And unless we shift from output to interpretation, weāll keep producing Ghost Graduatesānow with viral credentials.
š§ Offloading Isnāt CheatingāItās Strategy
In your viral essay āAI Makes Me Stupidāand I Love Itā, you flipped the script:
āIād rather be stupid and productive than smart but stagnant.ā
Thatās not defeatistāitās defiant. You argued that cognitive offloading isnāt new; itās evolution. From calculators to calendars, weāve always outsourced mental strain to focus on higher-order thinking. AI just supercharges that process.
So yes, Prompt Professors may be offloading understanding. But offloading isnāt inherently bad. It becomes dangerous only when we mistake it for mastery.
The real flex isnāt pretending to be smartāitās knowing when to be strategic.
- Let AI handle the grunt work
- Let humans handle the nuance
- Let creators build with clarity, not clutter
Because, as you said:
āAI builds my tables, fields, and does most of the coding for my EMR. But what makes me more stupid than the rest? I use more AIs.ā
Thatās not stupidity. Thatās systems thinking. And itās the kind of āstupidā that builds empires.
š§ Explain Like Iām 12
Imagine you have a magic pen. You ask it to write a science report, and it does. You turn it in, get an A, and feel smart. But if someone asks you what the report means, you donāt know. Thatās what happens when we use AI to sound smart without learning.
š§© Final Thought
AI can make you sound brilliant. But brilliance without understanding is just noise. Letās stop rewarding the loudest outputs and start valuing the quiet work of learning, reflecting, and building real expertise.
Because in the end, the smartest voice in the room isnāt the one that trendsāitās the one that thinks.