Why the Philippines Cares More About Concrete Than CuriosityāAnd Why Thatās Dooming Our Future
š FLOOD CONTROL WITHOUT FLOOD CONTROL?
Weāve grown used to it:
- ā±500 million for drainage⦠that overflows in 10 minutes of rain.
- āState-of-the-artā pumping stations⦠that look pretty on a tarpaulin.
- Officials in orange vests posing in knee-deep floodwater after the project is done. š§āāļøš¦
Itās embarrassing. Itās corrupt. But letās be honestāit doesnāt shock us anymore.
We shrug. We sigh. We say, āEh, ganun talaga.ā (Thatās just how it is.)
š©āš« BUT A TEACHER-LESS CLASSROOM?
Now that gets our attention.
The very ideaāreplacing Maāam Santos with a chatbot, swapping Sir Garcia for a algorithmādoesnāt just surprise us.
It feels like a betrayal.
And that double standard says everything about why this country is stuck.
šø WE PRIORITIZE CONCRETE OVER CURIOSITY
Weāll approve ā±1 billion for a bridge that goes nowhere.
But weāll debate for years over ā±5,000 more per month for teachers.
Weāll spend millions on flood control that controls no floods.
But we wonāt invest in AI that could help a generation control their future.
Weāre not just choosing infrastructure over education.
Weāre choosing corruption over children.
š¤ THE AI SCHOOL EXPERIMENT NO ONEāS TALKING ABOUT
In Virginia, USA, a private school is chargingĀ $65,000 per year (ā±3.7 million)Ā for a teacher-less AI education.
Is it the future?
Is it ethical?
Is it even education?
These are important questions.
But hereās the question we should be asking:
What happens when only the rich can afford teachersāreal or AI?
š THE PINOY REALITY: WEāRE HEADED FOR A TWO-TIERED SYSTEM
Tier 1: The rich study with AI + elite human mentors.
Tier 2: The rest get 60 students in a room with one overworked teacher.
Weāre not facing a teacher-less future.
Weāre facing a teacher-for-the-rich future.
And that should terrify everyone.
š§± BUILDING WALLS VS BUILDING MINDS
Flood control is important.
But education is existential.
You can survive a flood.
You canāt survive ignorance.
Yet we keep pouring money into concrete that washes awayāinstead of minds that can rebuild.
šØ THIS ISNāT JUST ABOUT AI. ITāS ABOUT VALUES.
A country that invests in flood controlāeven poorlyāis a country that cares about comfort.
A country that invests in education is a country that cares about tomorrow.
Right now, the Philippines is choosing comfort over tomorrow.
And until that changes, no AI, no teacher, no policy will save us.
š” THE WAY FORWARD: DEMAND BOTH
We donāt have to choose between flood control and education.
We can demand:
ā
Real flood controlānot ghost projects
ā
Real investment in teachersānot just AI experiments for the rich
ā
AI as a tool for public goodānot just private profit
The goal isnāt to replace teachers with robots.
Itās to give teachers robots as assistants.
šÆ BOTTOM LINE: STOP NORMALIZING FAILURE.
Weāve normalized corrupt flood control.
Donāt let them normalize corrupt education.
A teacher-less classroom shouldnāt just āshockā us.
It should activate us.
Our future doesnāt depend on AI.
It depends on us caring enough to fight for it.
šš FLOOD CONTROL-LESS
And while we argue about AI teachers, letās not forget the flood control-less flood control projects that continue to waste billions while our people swim through streets every rainy season.
Weāre willing to fund invisible infrastructure but hesitant to invest in visible intelligence.
Weād rather build submerged concrete than empowered minds.
The same ghosts that drain our flood control budgets are the ones leaving our classrooms empty of real innovation.