🔍 Summary of the Article
The MSN opinion piece titled “Art of the Steal: Trump’s Big Tech Feud Could Cost Zuckerberg AI, Books, or Bucks” explores how former U.S. President Donald Trump’s ongoing feud with Big Tech—particularly Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg—could have ripple effects on the AI industry. Trump has publicly criticized Zuckerberg and hinted at potential regulatory or legal retaliation if he returns to power. The article suggests that this political tension could impact Meta’s AI ambitions, including its open-source LLaMA models, funding streams, and partnerships.
🧠 Why It Matters in the AI World
- AI Development Is Political: The U.S. government plays a major role in shaping AI policy, funding, and regulation. If political leaders target specific companies, it could stall or redirect innovation.
- Open-Source AI at Risk: Meta’s LLaMA models are among the most powerful open-source AI tools available. If political pressure forces Meta to scale back, the global AI community could lose access to a major resource.
- Techlash Meets AIlash: As AI becomes more powerful, it’s also becoming more politicized. This feud is a preview of how future administrations—regardless of party—might use AI as a bargaining chip or weapon.
🇵🇭 Why the Philippines Should Quietly Pay Attention
While this may seem like a distant U.S. drama, the implications are real for countries like the Philippines:
- We Rely on U.S.-Built AI Tools: Many Filipino developers, educators, and startups use Meta’s open-source models to build local apps, chatbots, and learning tools. If access is restricted, innovation here could slow.
- Policy Imitation Is Real: Philippine tech policy often mirrors U.S. trends. If AI becomes a political football abroad, it could influence how our own leaders approach regulation, censorship, or data control.
- Global AI Equity Is at Stake: When AI tools become entangled in elite power struggles, smaller nations risk being left out of the conversation—or worse, left behind.
This isn’t about choosing sides. It’s about understanding how global tech politics shape the tools we depend on.
⚖️ Final Thought: When Power Meets Prompt Engineering
The future of AI won’t be decided by engineers alone—it will be shaped by presidents, policies, and power plays. Whether it’s Trump vs. Zuckerberg or any other political-tech clash, the real question is: Who gets to shape the future of intelligence?
For the Philippines, the answer lies in staying informed, building local capacity, and ensuring we’re not just passive users of AI, but active participants in its direction.
Source: MSN Opinion – “Art of the Steal: Trump’s Big Tech Feud Could Cost Zuckerberg AI, Books, or Bucks”
AI and Philippine Politics: Part 3 > “Blessed are ye poor: for yours is the kingdom of God.” > — Read more
Unraveling the political allegiance of Bard, a hypothetical male politician, sparks fervent debates. Would he align with Democrats or Republicans? Read more
What happens when the people writing the laws start using the tools that might need regulating? A growing number of Read more
Find out how AI is revolutionizing politics and governance in the Philippines. From personalized messaging to automated processes, AI is Read more
